[Free] 2017(Jan) EnsurePass Braindumps Juniper JN0-694 Dumps with VCE and PDF 1-10

Ensurepass.com : Ensure you pass the IT Exams
2017 Jan Juniper Official New Released JN0-694
100% Free Download! 100% Pass Guaranteed!
http://www.EnsurePass.com/JN0-694.html

Enterprise Routing and Switching Support, Professional (JNCSP- ENT)

Question No: 1

– Exhibit –

user@routergt; show ospf database

Area 0.0.0.1

Type ID Adv Rtr Seq Age Opt Cksum Len

Router 172.24.255.1 172.24.255.1 0x800000d4 182 0x22 0x59f3 36

Router 172.24.255.2 172.24.255.2 0x800000d4 177 0x22 0x57f2 36

Router *172.24.255.4 172.24.255.4 0x800000dc 176 0x22 0x75fa 72

Network 172.24.124.2 172.24.255.2 0x80000007 177 0x22 0x7957 36

Summary 172.24.13.0 172.24.255.1 0x80000004 2370 0x22 0x3f62 28

Summary 172.24.23.0 172.24.255.1 0x80000002 471 0x22 0xdeb9 28

Summary 172.24.255.1 172.24.255.1 0x800000cb 2037 0x22 0x2bbb 28

Summary 172.24.255.2 172.24.255.2 0x800000cc 487 0x22 0x19ca 28

Summary 172.24.255.3 172.24.255.1 0x80000003 140 0x22 0xb2f9 28

OSPF AS SCOPE link state database Type ID Adv Rtr Seq Age Opt Cksum Len

Extern *1.47.82.0 172.24.255.4 0x80000002 1037 0x22 0x4225 36

Extern *100.0.0.0 172.24.255.4 0x80000001 2643 0x22 0xfc88 36

user@routergt; show ospf neighbor Address Interface State ID Pri Dead

172.24.124.2 ge-0/0/1.0 Full 172.24.255.2 128 36

172.24.124.1 ge-0/0/1.0 Full 172.24.255.1 128 30

user@routergt; show ospf interface ge-0/0/1.0 extensive Interface State Area DR ID BDR ID Nbrs

ge-0/0/1.0 PtToPt 0.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2

Type: P2MP, Address: 172.24.124.4, Mask: 255.255.255.0, MTU: 1500, Cost: 1

Adj count: 2

Hello: 10, DeaD. 40, ReXmit: 5, Not Stub Auth type: None

Protection type: None

Topology default (ID 0) -gt; Cost: 1

user@routergt; show route protocol ospf table inet.0

inet.0: 11133 destinations, 11135 routes (11133 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)

= Active Route, – = Last Active, * = Both

224.0.0.5/32 *[OSPF/10] 1w0d 00:01:14, metric 1

MultiRecv

– Exhibit –

Click the Exhibit button.

Referring to the exhibit, why are the OSPF routes missing from the routing table for this router?

  1. mismatching OSPF interface type with the neighbor

  2. MTU mismatch with the neighbor

  3. incorrect IP address configured on the interface

  4. no Type 4 LSAs in the OSPF database

Answer: A

Question No: 2

– Exhibit –

user@routergt; show route protocol bgp detail

inet.0: 20 destinations, 20 routes (19 active, 0 holddown, 1 hidden)

10.222.1.3/32 (1 entry, 1 announced)

*BGP Preference: 170/-101 Next hop type: Indirect Address: 0x15ec944

Next-hop reference count: 3 Source: 1.1.1.1

Next hop type: Router, Next hop index: 536 Next hop: 1.1.1.1 via ge-0/0/1.0, selected Protocol next hop: 1.1.1.1

Indirect next hop: 14081d0 262142 State:

Local AS: 65222 Peer AS: 65221

Age: 2:12 MetriC. 1 Metric2: 0 Task: BGP_65221.1.1.1.1 56417

Announcement bits (2): 0-KRT 4-Resolve tree 1 AS path: 65221 I

Communities: no-advertise Accepted

Localpref: 100

Router ID. 10.222.1.1

– Exhibit –

Click the Exhibit button.

You are troubleshooting a problem where an EBGP route is not being advertised to your local IBGP peers. You have received a 10.222.1.3/32 route from an EBGP peer as shown in the exhibit, but the route is not being advertised.

What is causing the problem?

  1. The route shows as a hidden route and cannot be advertised.

  2. The next hop for the route is indirect and prevents the route from being advertised.

  3. The community prevents the route from being advertised.

  4. The local preference value is too high for the route to be advertised.

Answer: C

Question No: 3

– Exhibit – protocols { bgp {

group isps { type external;

peer-as 13090194; multipath multiple-as; neighbor ;

neighbor ;

}

}

}

– Exhibit –

Click the Exhibit button.

The exhibit shows the complete BGP configuration for a router. The network operator reports that both peering sessions are up, but the router is not conducting per-flow load balancing over the connections to these two peers.

What are two causes for this behavior? (Choose two.)

  1. The forwarding-table export policy is not configured to cause per-flow load balancing.

  2. The multiple-as parameter causes BGP to only choose multiple paths to different ASs, rather than multiple paths to the same AS.

  3. The router has different IGP metrics to these BGP peers.

  4. The BGP peers are not sending identical advertisements over the two sessions.

Answer: A,D

Question No: 4

You use static routes for connectivity to the ISP. Your ISP recently switched to using different links for multicast and unicast traffic. Following the change, users in your company were unable to receive multicast traffic through the ISP.

What must you configure on your router to reestablish multicast connectivity to your ISP?

  1. Add a static default route to the ISP in the inet.2 routing table.

  2. Add the default-rpf-interface parameter under the [edit routing-options multicast] hierarchy.

  3. Add the upstream-interface parameter under the [edit protocols pim] hierarchy.

  4. Disable PIM on the interface used for unicast traffic.

Answer: A

Question No: 5

– Exhibit –

Ensurepass 2017 PDF and VCE

– Exhibit –

Click the Exhibit button.

Referring to the exhibit, you are configuring an OSPF network. All OSPF adjacencies come up and stay stable. But neither R1 nor R2 has the prefix 200.200.200.200/32 in its routing table.

What is causing this problem?

  1. R2 does not have the export policy for prefix 200.200.200.200/32.

  2. R1 does not have routes to network 172.10.1.0/24.

C. R2 is BDR on both network 172.10.1.0/24 and 172.20.1.0/24.

D. The router ID of R1 is the same as the router ID of R3.

Answer: D

Question No: 6

You are monitoring a network that is configured with PIM sparse mode. An end user#39;s PC (PC1) joins a multicast stream. The stream never switches from the rendezvous-point tree

(RPT) to the shortest-path tree (SPT).

Which two statements explain this behavior? (Choose two.)

  1. An interface on the SPT is not configured for PIM.

  2. The designated router for PCI#39;s LAN does not have a route to the multicast source.

  3. This is the normal operation of PIM sparse mode.

  4. This is a source-specific multicast (SSM) stream.

Answer: A,B

Question No: 7

– Exhibit –

Ensurepass 2017 PDF and VCE

– Exhibit –

Click the Exhibit button.

Your network has two connections to your ISP. You have been asked to load-balance

traffic across both links that connect to your ISP. You have enabled multipath for this peer, but you are still not getting the expected load balancing.

Given the information shown in the exhibit, what else must you do?

  1. Configure and apply a load-balancing policy.

  2. Change the multipath parameter to multihop.

  3. Create a policy to manually change the next hops.

  4. Enable the keep all parameter.

Answer: A

Question No: 8

You are asked to troubleshoot a problem with MSTP and determine why Switch-1 and Switch-2 think they are the root bridge for the same MSTI instances. Switch-1 should be the root bridge for the MSTI 1 instance and Switch-2 should be the root bridge for the MSTI 2 instance. Referring to the exhibit, what is causing this problem?

Ensurepass 2017 PDF and VCE

  1. The configuration digest is misconfigured.

  2. Both switches have the same bridge priority.

  3. The member VLAN assignments are not identical.

  4. The revision levels are identical.

Answer: C

Question No: 9

Two neighboring routers are able to form an OSPF adjacency, but are not able to establish an IBGP neighborship.

What are two reasons for the IBGP neighborship problem? (Choose two.)

  1. One of the devices has a misconfigured BGP peer address.

  2. One or both of the connected interfaces are missing the family iso statement.

  3. OSPF has a lower route preference than BGP.

  4. A firewall filter on one of the interfaces is blocking TCP traffic.

Answer: B,C

Question No: 10

There is a lot of traffic marked with IP precedence values af2l and af3l that ingresses the router. The af3l traffic should be using the expedited forwarding queue, but the traffic is much lower than expected and there are no drops seen on the egress interface.

Ensurepass 2017 PDF and VCE

Ensurepass 2017 PDF and VCE

Referring to the exhibit, what is causing the problem?

  1. The assured forwarding queue has a strict high priority and is starving the expedited forwarding queue.

  2. The expedited forwarding queue has a low priority value; therefore the traffic is not serviced.

  3. The MF classifier is forwarding most of the af3l traffic to the best-effort queue.

  4. The MF classifier is does not match on af3l and therefore the traffic is being dropped.

Answer: C

100% Ensurepass Free Download!
Download Free Demo:JN0-694 Demo PDF
100% Ensurepass Free Guaranteed!
Download 2017 EnsurePass JN0-694 Dumps

EnsurePass ExamCollection Testking
Lowest Price Guarantee Yes No No
Up-to-Dated Yes No No
Real Questions Yes No No
Explanation Yes No No
PDF VCE Yes No No
Free VCE Simulator Yes No No
Instant Download Yes No No

2017 EnsurePass IT Certification PDF and VCE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.